Comparison of eriksons and banduras theories

This is the age commonly known as the 'terrible twos'. All of these theories help me improve my understanding of the development of young children and I think it is important not to just choose one philosophy to apply to education and ignore all the rest, but to combine them to gain a greater understanding of children.

This is a sort of dry run before the real game starts in adolescence. If the quality of care is good in infancy, the child learns to trust the world to meet her needs. As such Erikson's theory is useful for teaching, parenting, self-awareness, managing and coaching, dealing with conflict, and generally for understanding self and others.

In some ways the development actually peaks at stage seven, since stage eight is more about taking stock and coming to terms with how one has made use of life, and ideally preparing to leave it feeling at peace. Autonomy versus Doubt 18 months to 3 yearsStage 3: This again is an opportunity for the child to show initiative and take responsibility.

Crisis stages connect with each other like inter-laced fingers, not like a series of neatly stacked boxes. Erikson also identified a second supporting 'strength' word at each stage, which along with the basic virtue emphasised the main healthy outcome at each stage, and helped convey simple meaning in summaries and charts.

A punishment simply stops or reduces a negative behavior, whereas negative reinforcement works to improve the behavior, not just stop it.

So his theory is useful far beyond psychoanalysis - it's useful for any application involving personal awareness and development - of oneself or others.

Each crisis stage relates to a corresponding life stage and its inherent challenges. At the end of this process, there can be a presentation to the community of the work done as tangible proof of effort and achievement. However, it must be kept in mind that Erikson did not have much knowledge of cultures and societies other than his own, and thus the universality of his theory can and must be questioned.

This term is an extension of Sigmund Freud's use of the word 'crisis', which represents internal emotional conflict.

Crisis stages are driven by physical and sexual growth, which then prompts the life issues which create the crises.

Social Learning Theory (Bandura)

How do we respond to the characteristics of this developmental stage? No-one should become complacent, and there is hope for us all. Boys I'm going to marry mum and maybe kill dad. There is a book called the Walkabout Papers by Dr Maurice James, which talks of this process of student initiative in great detail.

He proposed 4 Stages of cognitive development: The very young child learns by feeling with all the senses, and an expression of autonomy in this process seems very relevant to the child's growth.

In it is described how a student sets a challenge for himself in certain areas, and plans and executes a project in each of these. The top three levels depict growth needs: Below is a reminder of the crisis stages, using the crisis terminology of the original model aside from the shorter terminology that Erikson later preferred for stages one and eight.

Erikson emphasised the significance of and 'mutuality' and 'generativity' in his theory. Erikson was sparing in his use of the word 'achieve' in the context of successful outcomes, because it implied gaining something clear-cut and permanent.

If this autonomy is thwarted, three consequences may ensue: Everyone potentially affects everyone else's experiences as they pass through the different crisis stages. Where do babies come from? The final three adult stages happen at particularly variable ages.

Erikson never showed precise ages, and I prefer to state wider age ranges than many other common interpretations.

Interpretations of age range vary among writers and academics.Throughout time, many psychologists have had their own views about different theories. Theories direct and guide our perception of thinking. The similarities and differences can be broken down through different forms of development by Erik Erikson, Sigmund Freud, and Albert Bandura.

Throughout time, many psychologists have had their own views about different theories. Theories direct and guide our perception of thinking. The similarities and differences can be broken down through different forms of development by Erik Erikson, Sigmund Freud, and Albert Bandura.

Sigmund Freud. Erik Erikson was a psychologist who did most of his work in the post-Freudian era, in the s to the s.

He was a student of Freud, and was greatly influenced by the latter's theories of. B.F. Skinner believed that people are directly reinforced by positive or negative experiences in an environment and demonstrate learning through their altered behavior when confronted with the same scenario. Albert Bandura believed learning is not always measured by behavior and can even be done by.

Of the five major perspectives, the child development theories of Piaget, Erickson, and Bandura, have helped explain why the understanding of normal child and adolescent development is an important part of a child’s overall performance.

Comparison Of Erikson And Bandura Theories Psychology Essay. Print Reference this. In comparison to the theory generated by Bandura he developed eight psychosocial stages that a human being goes through from childhood to late adulthood.

His stages in the theory progress cumulatively rather than linearly.

Compare and contrast piagets and vygotskys theories of cognitive development essay

The two theories have however.

Comparison of eriksons and banduras theories
Rated 3/5 based on 45 review